Posted by
Gar on Thursday, September 17, 2009 4:59:42 PM
Helloooooo.... Hellooo helloooo.... CNN is still missing in action (go figure) As
FoxNews reports the action to defund ACORN at the Federal level, looking through the
CNN political page online.........crickets chirping have beeen louder.
I understand how inappropriate it might be for a Government Media Outlet (GMO) to report on the organization which had so much to do with the current Washington Regime being placed in power, but the job of reporting does require some sort of attention to even the most offensive items of news doesn't it?
The lack of reporting on the issue by the GMO's appears to be centered around the concept that if they don't report it, it isn't real.
Wrong!
The Emperor has no clothes. And in this case doesn't even want clothes. (must be summer time) CNN and the other GMO's are acting like the typical two year old who hides behind a floor lamp post and knows you can't see them....because they can't see you.
The GMO's are in that exact position, they can't see us seeing them not do their job, so we don't see them not doing their job.
OK, just a bit convoluted, but I think we all know what is happening. Embarrassing the Second Black President is not a good business move in the current economic climate. Flatulence being directed towards the wrong direction can bring about a Government takeover in a heartbeat. And despite being completely in the pocket of the current Washington Regime, the GMO's have no interest in being taken over like Government Motors was, it's bad for business.
But the current business model is bad for business also, since they are all contracting, while Fox News grows. I wonder how that is played out in the ultra secret board meetings? Does anyone actually have the testicular fortitude to state the obvious?
Such as: "We're in the deep end of the septic tank and losing ground monthly, what's wrong with this picture?"
Would that person be invited to leave the organization post haste? Or would even the most obvious question be unheard and unrecognizable when uttered.
Stock holders in the GMO's must be just as confused as I am as to why a corporation in business, to at least, ostensibly make a profit, would engage in such a destructive and counter-profit making series of actions.
Is it possible for a Sugar-Daddy with big bucks to have propped up the GMO's in question, or at least the board members perhaps?
Something is wrong with the picture of complicity in the lack of actual reporting of news which shows the current Washington Regime in a poor light, and it desperately needs light shone on the problem to find an answer.